I read this in an article, and decided to try to articulate a response:
As a person who suffers (and I mean that in a very real and active sense of suffering) from depression, I want to believe what you're saying here with every fiber of my being. But then what? Believing that God "allows" suffering to happen rather than actively causing it may be more theologically accurate, but it does nothing to relieve my actual suffering. None of the ideas you present, while they do appeal to me theologically and intellectually, do anything to actually relieve my or anyone else's actual, lived-in-the-flesh suffering. Somehow, knowing that God is just "present" with me in my suffering, as if God were a sort of mystical Teddy bear, isn't enough. Not after thirty years. - Cynthia
As a person who suffers (and I mean that in a very real and active sense of suffering) from depression, I want to believe what you're saying here with every fiber of my being. But then what? Believing that God "allows" suffering to happen rather than actively causing it may be more theologically accurate, but it does nothing to relieve my actual suffering. None of the ideas you present, while they do appeal to me theologically and intellectually, do anything to actually relieve my or anyone else's actual, lived-in-the-flesh suffering. Somehow, knowing that God is just "present" with me in my suffering, as if God were a sort of mystical Teddy bear, isn't enough. Not after thirty years. - Cynthia
Hi, Cynthia. Your comment is excellent and
essential. Thank you for it. I am challenged by your reflection and
question, which I read as asking for a bridge between the rational theology and
practical application. Here’s some of my
thinking on those lines. Please know
that I, too, know suffering and am speaking of my personal experience and
reflection, rather than telling you what yours should be.
The bridge, for me, is the
incarnation. God became human so that
humans might become God, as St. Athanasius believed. Thus, the incarnation is not only about God
and God’s love for humanity. It is not
merely God showing love by becoming one with the beloved. That alone would be nice, and reason to
praise God’s humility but not very
meaningful if left there. There is
another, too often neglected side of the equation: humans might become
God. Wow! Now that’s love. For God to be so far beyond what we
understand to be human and then show love by, not just coming to our level, but
to bring us to God’s own level. When we
perceive this, that is when we experience awe, in both amazement and in ear and
trembling.
So, what does it mean to
become God? Well, first, like Jesus, we
do not deem equality with God something to be grasped at. Rather, we empty ourselves. We take the form of one who serves, rather
than of one who is served. For some of
us, we think of our pain as either something directly or indirectly caused by
God or at least as something God could and therefore, out of love, should take
away.
If humans have been given the
gift of becoming God, or becoming who God is, then human beings are invited to
be God taking away the pain, sin, suffering, etc. of the world. When I focus on doing that, I find, my
suffering stops being the focus or even the identity of who I am. By being God to another human, especially in
their pain and suffering, and allowing
them to be God to me, the two of us become one, just like the Son in the Father
and the Father in the Son. And we become
one with both, as well. Jesus’ prayer,
that all be one, is at least partially fulfilled.
In my own pain and suffering
I must die to self and rise to be who I am made to be: the presence and action of God in the world
now, and in complete communion with God and all that is forever, in what we
call heaven. I summation, the important
question is no longer why, but how. How
do I go beyond my suffering for the sake of others? And the answer is the question: by going beyond myself for the sake of
others; by being God.
Might your own experience
validate this in anyway?
No comments:
Post a Comment